Is helping Ukraine worth risking WW3?
Last Updated: 02.07.2025 23:35

Please kindly ask Mr Putin to avoid the WW3.
Ukraine’s getting invitation to NATO is WW3?
All they have to do is to withdraw their troops.
Sending weapons to Ukraine is certainly WW3.
Any day of the week — including Sundays.
Sending Stormshadow/Scalp missiles is WW3.
Trump approving to kill Soleimani is WW3.
Letting Ukraine strike targets in Crimea is WW3.
What’s next?
GM plans $4 billion push to move production from Mexico to U.S. - The Detroit News
Supplying Ukraine with Tomahawks is WW3? Stationing western troops in Odesa is WW3?
Let’s just make it real clear:
Russia can stop this any time.
Chiefs trivia: Your in-5 daily game, Friday edition - Arrowhead Pride
Sending Abrams tanks is absolutely WW3.
Letting Ukraine strike Russia with their home-made weapons is WW3.
Ukrainians are so tired of hearing all this nonsense.
Why has no country adopted the SA80/L85 rifle?
Sending HIMARS is surely WW3.
Thank you.
Ukraine refusing to surrender to Russia in February 2022 is WW3.
Yankees get completely manhandled by Dodgers in ghastly blowout loss - New York Post
Sending MANPADS/ATGMs to Ukraine is undoubtedly WW3.
Ukraine’s incursion into Russia is undeniably WW3.
Ukraine getting Javelins is WW3.
All-time great wrestler Hakuho quits Japan Sumo Association with plans to form global body - AP News
Sending F16s to Ukraine is WW3.
Letting Ukraine fire ATACMS at Russian air bases is patently conclusively unequivocally WW3.
“It’s going to be WW3!” is the most notorious notion used by fear-mongers for years.
Sending ATACMS is WW3.
Just in the last 5 years:
Ukraine kicking Russia out of Ukraine is WW3?